Patents- May 2, 1891

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


ASSIGNMENTS, LICENSES, MORTGAGES OF PATENTS. Supreme Court of the United States. WATERMAN VS. MACKENZIE et al. An assignment is an instrument in writing, conveying either (1) the whole patent, comprising the exclusive right to make, use, and vend the invention throughout the United States; or (2) an undivided part or share of that exclusive right; or (3) the exclusive right under the patent within and throughout a specified part of the United States. Such an instrument vests in the assignee a title in so much of the patent itself, with a right to sue infringers, alone in the first and third cases, and joiutly with the assignor in the second. Any other transfer is a mere license, giving the licensee no title in the patent and no right to sue at law in his own name for an infringement. A grant, by the owner of a patent, of the sole and exclusive right and license to manufacture and sell the patented article throughout the United States, does not iuclude the right to use such patented article, at least if manufactured by third persons, and is, therefore, a mere license. The recording of a mortgage of a patent right in the Patent Office is equivalent to a delivery of possession and makes the title of the mortgagee complete toward all other persons, as well as against the mortgagor; and the mortgagee is the only person who can thereafter sue for an infringement of the patent by third persons. Mr. Justice Gray delivered the opinion of the court. To Remove Tattooing. Mr. T. W. Dodd, of Walsingham, England, writes as follows in the Chemist and Druggist: " Twenty years ago I removed three very indelible tattoo marks on my hand. Certainly it left a scar, but now it is scarcely perceptible. The operation was performed by applying nitric acid with the stopper of the bottle (a better instrument would be a glass rod pointed, to carry the acid), just sufficient to cover the stain, so as to avoid making a larger scar than needful, the acid to remain about one and a half minutes, until the outisvera was penetrated and a crusted appearance shown, then washed off with clean cold water. In a few days after this treatment a scab forms, which contains the tattoo mark or stain ; remove it, and should inflammation supervene,poultice and bathe with warm water. In this way the skin with the stain is not only removed almost painlessly (I mean tattoo marks about the size of peas), but the nitric acid at the same time to a certain extent seems to decolorize the stain. Of course large tattoo marks, greatly extending over the surface, must necessitate the operation being performed differently. Dr. Variot, of the Paris Biological Society, advises the following method : Tattoo the skin, in the usual way, with a concentrated solution of tannin, following the original design. Then apply a crayon of nitrate of silver until the part tattooed with the tannin blackens. Wipe off excess of moisture and allow matters to take their own course. Slight pain continues for two to four days, and after two months the cicatrix which results will almost disappear.--Amer. Druggist.

SA Supplements Vol 31 Issue 800suppThis article was published with the title “Patents” in SA Supplements Vol. 31 No. 800supp (), p. 273
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05021891-12790csupp

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe