Declining Fish Supply Linked to Land Animal Extinctions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An analysis of nearly 30 years of data on African wildlife has uncovered a link between declining fish stocks and increased hunting and bush meat trade. The results suggest that when fish sources of protein wane, people turn toward illegal hunting on land, which can lead to species extinction.

Justin S. Brashares of the University of California at Berkeley and his colleagues studied animal census information collected between 1970 and 1998 by park rangers in Ghana and compared it to information collected about the fish supply in the region over the same time period. The researchers found a 76 percent drop in overall abundance for the 41 species studied, which included buffalo, antelope, jackal and lion. In particular, the team discovered that in years with a below average fish supply, there was a greater decline in the land animal populations. In addition, some smaller game reserves experienced local extinctions of nearly half the studied species.

The team also studied the sale of bush meat in 12 rural markets throughout Ghana in 1999 and found that poor fishing seasons were inversely related to both the price of fish and the amount of bush meat available for sale. ¿Our study present very strong evidence showing how human food supply can be directly related to conservation of wildlife,¿ Brashares says. ¿We need people working together across disciplines to look at how losses of marine resources are impacting land resources and vice versa.¿

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe