New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Declining Fish Supply Linked to Land Animal Extinctions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An analysis of nearly 30 years of data on African wildlife has uncovered a link between declining fish stocks and increased hunting and bush meat trade. The results suggest that when fish sources of protein wane, people turn toward illegal hunting on land, which can lead to species extinction.

Justin S. Brashares of the University of California at Berkeley and his colleagues studied animal census information collected between 1970 and 1998 by park rangers in Ghana and compared it to information collected about the fish supply in the region over the same time period. The researchers found a 76 percent drop in overall abundance for the 41 species studied, which included buffalo, antelope, jackal and lion. In particular, the team discovered that in years with a below average fish supply, there was a greater decline in the land animal populations. In addition, some smaller game reserves experienced local extinctions of nearly half the studied species.

The team also studied the sale of bush meat in 12 rural markets throughout Ghana in 1999 and found that poor fishing seasons were inversely related to both the price of fish and the amount of bush meat available for sale. ¿Our study present very strong evidence showing how human food supply can be directly related to conservation of wildlife,¿ Brashares says. ¿We need people working together across disciplines to look at how losses of marine resources are impacting land resources and vice versa.¿

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe