Deeper into the Deep Field

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Once again, the Earth-orbiting Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has gone where no telescope has gone before, looking farther into space and further back in time. Indeed, astronomers guess that the galaxies the orbiting observatory recently glimpsed in this infrared image may have formed some 12 billion years ago, when the universe was still in its infancy.

COMPARISON. The distant galaxy in the visible-light picture (top) looks uncharacteristically lumpy because the WFPC2 can detect only the bright blue knots of star birth. Infrared images of the same galaxy taken with NICMOS (bottom), however, reveal the underlying disk structure, containing older stars.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"These are the deepest images of distant galaxies that have ever been obtained," said Rodger I. Thompson of the University of Arizona, in early October. Thompson led this latest HST study, the results of which are due to appear in the Astronomical Journal.

The pictures help resolve a mystery that surfaced three years ago, when HST last focused on this patch of sky, dubbed the Hubble Deep Field. The telescope's optical Wide Field/Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) trained its lens on the deep field for 10-hour exposures in 1995, photographing many new galaxies. In doing so, it also caught on film a few peculiar objects that resembled lumpy knots of blue light.

Thompson's team finally got a good look at these odd clumps thanks to an infrared camera--the Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS)--mounted on HST last year. Because the universe is continuously expanding, light emanating from the farthest galaxies--those at the very fringes of the universe--is "redshifted." In other words, its wavelength is stretched beyond the visible range and into the infrared.

In January 1998, NICMOS opened its shutter onto a section of the deep field for 36 hours. Its greater resolving power showed that the lumpy objects in the optical deep field exposures were in fact areas of intense star formation within ordinary--albeit ancient--star systems. The underlying structures of these distant galaxies, made clear by NICMOS, were simply not hot enough for the WFPC2 to record. NICMOS also revealed a slew of previously unknown celestial outlayers.

Studying these galaxies in detail will help astronomers better characterize the birth of the universe and judge its age. To determine the exact nature and distance of these galaxies, though, they will need an instrument more powerful than NICMOS. The good news is that just such a device--one that can measure all the necessary infrared spectrums--is planned for HST's progeny, the Next Generation Space Telescope, scheduled for launch in 2007.

Eight years isn't such a long wait to see back to the beginning of time.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe