New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Deltas Gain Ground—but the Trend Won’t Last  

New analysis reveals river deltas’ surprising expansion 

Ganges River delta.

GETTY IMAGES

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Earth's river deltas have long been home to vital ports and wetlands. Despite sea-level rise, these economic and ecological hotspots have expanded on the whole in recent decades, scientists have found—but this trend is unlikely to last. Geoscientist Jaap Nienhuis of Utrecht University in the Netherlands and his colleagues have pinpointed almost 11,000 river deltas in data from satellites and worldwide field studies. Using computer simulations, they estimated how tides, waves and human activity upstream affected each delta's size and shape from 1985 through 2015. In many watersheds along South America's eastern coast, as well as Asia's eastern, southern and southeastern coasts, the researchers found that deforestation increased sediment carried by rivers—and that deltas have grown accordingly. (The Ganges delta, as seen here, is one such example.) In North America, however, dams have trimmed the volume of sediment available to nourish many river deltas.

Although sea levels rose about 10 centimeters during the period studied, river deltas in aggregate gained about 54 square kilometers of new land each year, the researchers reported in January in Nature. But they say that growth is most likely only a short-term phenomenon. Molly Keogh, a wetlands ecologist most recently at Tulane University, who was not involved in the study, agrees; she notes that sea levels are projected to increase about 60 centimeters by the end of the 21st century. Also, delta sediments are notorious for compacting under their own weight over time.

This “double whammy,” as Keogh describes it, will lead to an overall shrinkage of river deltas across the world in the coming decades. Beyond the loss of low-lying infrastructure and fisheries, consequences could include the inundation of major population centers and agricultural regions.

Sid Perkins, who writes most often about Earth and planetary sciences, materials science and paleontology, is based in Crossville, Tenn.

More by Sid Perkins
Scientific American Magazine Vol 322 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Deltas Rising” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 322 No. 5 (), p. 17
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0520-17

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe