Destroyer of Worlds... and Ozone

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan could globally harm the ozone layer, according to computer simulations. If those nations each launched 50 Hiroshima-level nuclear weapons—a total of 1.5 megatons, or just 0.03 percent of the total explosive power of the world's nuclear arsenal—smoke from burning cities would loft up as much as five million metric tons of soot. This ash would eventually rise to stratospheric heights of up to 80 kilometers, where it would trigger ozone-destroying reactions. As much as 70 percent of the ozone above the high northern latitudes would get lost, a depletion comparable to the Antarctic ozone hole. Up to 45 percent of the ozone above the earth's midlatitudes, where most of the world's population lives, would also vanish. As stratospheric ozone diminished, ultraviolet light–triggered cancer and other forms of serious damage would rise sharply. The analysis, which appeared online April 7 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, suggests that the ozone would begin to recover only after five to eight years.

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Destroyer of Worlds... and Ozone” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 6 (), p. 36
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0608-36c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe