Destroying the Nerves of Teeth by Electricity

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An interesting paper on this subject was recently read before the College of Dentists in London, by T. Harding, M. D., in which he described his success in cauterizing the pulp of decayed teeth by the use of a current of electricity. He employs for this purpose a compound Smee's battery composed of six pairs of zinc and platinized silver plates in cells excited by dilute sulphuric acid. The conducting wires, which run from the opposite end plates and form the circuit, terminate in tips of fine platinum wire formed into a loop. The sides of tliis loop are brought parallel, not touching, but near together, then introduced into the cavity of the tooth to be operated upon. A handle is then touched which closes the circuit, and the electric current flows along the wire, raising the platinum tips to a white heat, which soon destroys the pulp of the tooth. The white light of the platinum points illumines the cavity, and allows the operator to perceive what he is doing. The operation is associated with little pain, and should precede tlie filling of decayed teetli, which cause pain from exposure of the pulp. This process cures severe ordinary toothache, and it may be used ?with decided advantage in almost every case of tooth disease, if carefully performed. Dr. Harding also stated that it was especially applicable to relieve neuralgia of the face dependent upon affected teeth. This form of teeth disease is very prevalent in our country, and causes the most excruciating pain. If this simple operation recommended by Dr. H. affords relief, it should at once be adopted by all our dentists. This method of cauterizing diseased teeth has been practised for six years by the author of the paper referred to, and in more than five thousand cases without the occurrence of a single accident worth naming. The President of the College, on the conclusion of reading the paper by Dr. H,, took opposite views as to the efficacy of cauterizing teeth by this process. He stated that he had tried it, without meeting with much success. He recommended a sedative for toothache m'ade of three grains of morphia, mixed with two drachms of a saturated solution of camphor, either in chloroform or alcohol. He had found this to be an excellent dressing in all cases of exposed pulp or sensitive dentine.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 20This article was published with the title “Destroying the Nerves of Teeth by Electricity” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 20 (), p. 156
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01231858-156a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe