Detecting Fog Using Signals from Cell-Phone Towers  

A novel technique can predict foggy conditions an hour before they appear

Paolo Toffanin Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Fog often leads to serious, costly collisions and accidents—particularly around airports, piers and highways. Monitoring visibility conditions in real-time could improve public safety and save tens of millions of dollars in the transportation sector alone. But conventional fog-detection systems—including satellites, visibility sensors and human observations—can suffer from poor spatial resolution, high cost or low sensitivity near the ground, where monitoring is most critical.

Now engineers Noam David and H. Oliver Gao, both then at Cornell University, have developed a way to use signal data from cell-phone towers to detect atmospheric conditions that are conducive to fog.

Wireless communications data are transmitted within networks of antenna towers as microwave radiation. And weather affects the strength of signals received at the towers. Thus, cellular data offer a low-cost, continuous means of fog monitoring.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


David and Gao successfully employed this approach to predict fog in a swath of land around Tel Aviv, Israel, up to an hour before it appeared. They identified patterns in how microwave signals are modified in response to changes in temperature and humidity. In addition, based on how fog droplets attenuate the signals directly, the researchers showed they could detect fog at times when high-level clouds obscure satellite views. Unlike satellites, the method also distinguishes between ground-level fog and low-level clouds. The research was detailed in studies published in January in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres and online in August in Natural Hazards.

Cellular networks are deployed worldwide, which would make it easy to utilize this method in most regions. “In principle, we could already use existing infrastructure for day-to-day early detection of fog formation,” David says. “Because system data can be received in real time, we can imagine short-term early warning against fog.” He advocates rigorous testing in diverse parts of the world to probe the method's limitations.

The new work shows it is possible to detect subtle conditions that precede fog formation. Kelly Caylor, an environmental scientist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, who was not involved in the work, calls it “a substantial step forward. There's something remarkable and quite satisfying about finding so much signal in what would otherwise be considered noise.”

Rachel Berkowitz is a freelance science writer and a corresponding editor for Physics Magazine. She is based in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eastsound, Wash.

More by Rachel Berkowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 319 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Signal in the Noise” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 319 No. 6 (), p. 16
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1218-16b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe