Devastating Medieval Earthquake Finally Understood

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

In 1356 a devastating earthquake shook Basel, Switzerland and almost completely destroyed the city, leveling nearly every fortified castle within a 30-kilometer radius. The cause of the temblor remained a mystery for 645 years. But according to a report in the latest issue of Science, Mustapha Meghraoui and his colleagues in Strasbourg, France and at the University of Basel have now pinpointed the quake's exact source. Furthermore, they have identified a pattern of seismic activity that may threaten the area again.

The researchers blame the1356 earthquake on an active fault near the city that appears at the surface as an abrupt change in ground level. During the past 8,500 years the fault has shifted some 1.8 meters (about six feet) and has produced three major earthquakes, of which the 1356 event was the most recent. The rock on either side of the fault line continues to move and "points to a recurrence time for a 1356-type earthquake in the Basel area of about 1,500 to 2,500 years," Meghraoui and team write.

Although the researches say that the pattern they identified doesn't indicate a recurrence in the near future, they are hopeful that steps will be taken to prepare for another earthquake of similar magnitude. Previously, the best estimate of the recurrence time of such an event for the Basel area was about 6,000 years. Several Swiss pharmaceutical and chemical concerns operate in the city, and three nuclear reactors lie within 50 kilometers. "We need to take precautionary measures now," co-author Domenico Giardini says.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American