Dialing

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Messrs. Editors—From the notice of sundials in a late issue of the Scientific American, I am led to make the following remarks :— There is no more beautiful or ingenious instrument than the sundial; when correctly made and its use properly understood, it can present the true time with an unvarying exactitude to be found only in the works of the Divine Artificer, upon which its power depends. The only difficulty lies in the variable nature of the shadow's progress through the varying nature of the sun's course, which will give a different reading to the hour circle from the mean, or average or clock time. While the dial indicates solar time, varying with the season, the clock presents equable or mean time, being the precise or exact division of the hours and minutes to their equable length, yet there is no real Ufference between the two. They both come to the same conclusion, and both precisely accomplish in a given period their due degree. Hence with the smallest possible trouble it is easy to find the very thing sought, and at any time to discover the true clock time. The following table will answer for such indication to any person using a dial: The sun's center is on meridian, and the dial shows noon on ff. m. s. Jan. 1, whentheclocktimeshows 12 4 3 Feb. 1, " " 12 13 57 Mar. 1, " " 12 12 32 April 9, " " 12 0 0 May 9, " " 11 56 55 June 9, " " 11 57 31 " 21, " " 12 0 20 July 1, " " 12 3 29 Aug. 1, " " 12 6 00 Sept. 1, " " 11 59 46 Oct. 1, " 11 49 35 Nov. 1, " " 11 43 43 Dec. 1, " " 11 49 23 By this it will be easy to see how much difference should be allowed for the equation of time, and at any period to find the clock time by the dial indication. It must be remembered, however, that a dial to be exact must be most carefully placed. Simply setting a dial north and south is not at all sufficient. Pains must be taken to secure a true meridian, and before the dial is located, that meridian should be found with great exactness, so that in setting the dial (if horizontal) the gnomon shall be perfectly adapted to the true meridian of the place where it is to stand. It would seem that an agreeable and really useful accompaniment to the dial would be a prolongation of the horary circle, sufficient to allow the scale of signs to be inscribed, and the style to track out the sun's path through the heavens, and thus unerringly indicate his place in the ecliptic. If in either side of the astronomic signs the names of the months were written, it would be a most pleasing occupation to notice month by month the progress of the sun in his vibrations backward and forward, and to children it would show clearly the motion of that planet. K. W. [The above communication on the construction of sundials is not only interesting' but valuable, and the facts contained have the freshness of positive experiment, and are consequently of interest to our readers.—Eds.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 41This article was published with the title “Dialing” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 41 (), p. 323
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican06191858-323a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe