Did any dinosaurs have poisonous saliva, as in Jurassic Park?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scott D. Sampson, curator of vertebrate paleontology at the Utah Museum of Natural History and assistant professor of geology and geophysics at the University of Utah, provides the following answer:

There is no conclusive evidence that any dinosaur possessed poisonous saliva. The poison-spitting dinosaur reconstructed in Jurassic Park is Dilophosaurus. At the time the movie was produced, there was no evidence that this or any other dinosaur spat poison or had poisonous saliva of any kind. In 2000, however, Mexican paleontologist Rub¿n A. Rodr¿guez de la Rosa of the Museum of the Desert in Saltillo presented suggestive evidence at the annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. He has recovered a single odd tooth from an unknown carnivorous dinosaur that possesses a groove reminiscent of those seen in snakes for transmitting poison. I have examined this tooth firsthand and, at this point, remain unconvinced. More examples need to be recovered before this hypothesis can be evaluated.

That said, it is well known that the largest lizard predator today, the Komodo dragon, does carry a potentially lethal bacterial load in its saliva that is used to poison prey. Not surprisingly, several people have suggested that some theropod (carnivorous) dinosaurs may have exhibited similar and equally unsavory behaviors, biting prey and letting the poison do the rest of the work. This might have proved an especially useful tactic for Jurassic predators such as Allosaurus, which most likely tackled prey animals many times its body size: the gargantuan, long-necked sauropods. Nevertheless, it is important to note that all of the above remains firmly embedded in speculation.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Answer originally posted September 4, 2001.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe