New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Digestive Decoys

Bacteria take toxic bullets aimed at human cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Travelers to the tropics usually try to avoid consuming the local microscopic flora responsible for "Montezuma's revenge" and other, more life-threatening intestinal illnesses. But an Australian research team thinks the best way to protect against those harmful gut bacteria may be to swig more bacteria: specifically, a benign strain of Escherichia coli genetically engineered to absorb other bacteria's toxins.

James C. Paton and his colleagues at the University of Adelaide altered a harmless strain of E. coli so that it sports human-like docking sites on the surface of its cell membrane. The idea is for bacterial toxins to bind to the decoy cells instead of to cells lining the human gut. The group's latest version mimics the human cell receptors for cholera toxin, and each bug soaks up 5 percent of its own weight in poison. In a test tube, the decoy bacteria neutralize 99.95 percent of the toxin's ability to kill human cells. When a dozen baby mice were given the modified bacteria and then infected with Vibrio cholerae, eight survived, whereas all 12 cholera-infected control mice died. Two thirds of the test mice survived even when researchers waited four hours after infection to treat them.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe