Digestive Decoys

Bacteria take toxic bullets aimed at human cells

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Travelers to the tropics usually try to avoid consuming the local microscopic flora responsible for "Montezuma's revenge" and other, more life-threatening intestinal illnesses. But an Australian research team thinks the best way to protect against those harmful gut bacteria may be to swig more bacteria: specifically, a benign strain of Escherichia coli genetically engineered to absorb other bacteria's toxins.

James C. Paton and his colleagues at the University of Adelaide altered a harmless strain of E. coli so that it sports human-like docking sites on the surface of its cell membrane. The idea is for bacterial toxins to bind to the decoy cells instead of to cells lining the human gut. The group's latest version mimics the human cell receptors for cholera toxin, and each bug soaks up 5 percent of its own weight in poison. In a test tube, the decoy bacteria neutralize 99.95 percent of the toxin's ability to kill human cells. When a dozen baby mice were given the modified bacteria and then infected with Vibrio cholerae, eight survived, whereas all 12 cholera-infected control mice died. Two thirds of the test mice survived even when researchers waited four hours after infection to treat them.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe