On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
A mystery bedeviling marine biologists for years was how life at the bottom of the ocean gets enough food. The measured amount of sinking organic particles did not seem to be enough to sustain the observed creatures there. The menu secret might be mucus. Tadpole-size creatures called giant larvaceans dwell in delicate houses of slime often more than a meter wide, which they use to snare food. Once a house gets too clogged, the larvacean abandons it and spins a new one. Bruce Robison and his colleagues at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute in Moss Landing, Calif., spent 10 years collecting larvacean houses and videoed the building and discarding of the mucous abodes. Larvaceans spun themselves a new house every day, with enough old homes descending to account for roughly half as much carbon as the rain of organic particles. Their findings fell into the June 10 Science.
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber