Dino Flight: Did a Four-Winged Dinosaur Stack Its Wings Like a Biplane?

Proposed posture for a feathered dinosaur stirs controversy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The invention of the biplane marked the beginning of manned flight, and now some researchers believe that the wing-on-top-of-wing design was present in an early flying animal as well. A new reconstruction of a controversial feathered dinosaur called Microraptor gui has the small beast gliding between treetops on a stacked pair of wings. If the finding withstands scrutiny, then the biplane design is 125 million years older than the Wright brothers' 1903 flight would suggest.

Discovered four years ago in northeastern China, Microraptor is one of more than half a dozen small feathered dinosaurs found in the region that may represent some of evolution's early—and possibly dead-end—experiments with feathered flight.

On parts of the creature's arms and legs, the discoverers observed a series of long asymmetric feathers, with one side of the feather narrower than the other. In modern birds such asymmetry is considered a hallmark of aerodynamic function—like the asymmetry of an airplane wing. Based on the orientation of the feathered remains, the group imagined the dinosaur flying spread-eagled, with wings trailing from each limb.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Paleontologist Sankar Chatterjee of Texas Tech University and his colleague, retired aeronautical engineer R. Jack Templin of Ottawa, Ontario, take issue with the reconstruction in a paper published online by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. "We realized there's something wrong in the anatomy because no dinosaurs could splay their legs sideways," Chatterjee says. "No birds can do that."

Chatterjee and Templin instead envisioned Microraptor's legs tucked under its body, with its rear feathers parallel to and beneath the feathers on its outspread arms. "It's a very common posture in living raptors," such as when holding prey, Chatterjee says. That's also a more realistic position, they say, because it puts the leading, narrower edges of the leg feathers forward against the direction of airflow, like the arm feathers. The spread-eagled wing plan had the feathers in clashing orientations, they note.

"It is pure conjecture," asserts evolutionary biologist Kenneth Dial of the University of Montana in Missoula. Dial describes the report as "an armwaving evolutionary interpretation" and says, "this is what has plagued the 'origin of avian flight' literature for 150 years." [See note below.]

Others see it differently. The biplane model is "creative and interesting," says evolutionary ornithologist Richard Prum of Yale University. "We have such radically new creatures, like this guy [Microraptor]. Everybody's scrambling to understand it," he says. "It's important that we explore lots of ideas."

In 2005 Dial and another researcher, writing in Nature, in which Microraptor's discovery was also published, issued a strongly worded comment arguing there was no evidence that such small feathered dinos flew (as opposed to ran), or that their wings could even support the loads required for flight.

"It's patently obvious that this creature had some kind of aerial behavior because of the nature of the wings," Prum insists. He says it's up in the air whether modern birds evolved from a four-winged design or Microraptor's lineage developed this trait on its own.

Prum says to better understand how the dinosaur might have flown, researchers will have to build realistic models that show how its feathers would likely have been positioned as the limbs moved around. "There are legitimate questions as to how this thing functioned," he says.

Note: parts of this article were modified after publication.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe