Disappearing Reptiles

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Reptiles aren't as cuddly as their herpetological cousins, the amphibians. Kermit, after all, is no Komodo dragon. But reptiles are in as much if not more danger of disappearing from the planet, an article in the August 11 issue of the journal BioScience reports. Indeed, although a great deal of public attention has focused on dwindling populations and deformities in amphibians in recent years, this new paper warns that reptiles probably warrant even more concern.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The problem, lead author Whit Gibbons of the University of Georgia says, is multifaceted, but perhaps the most serious threat of extinction comes from habitat loss and degradation. For instance, often only part of a habitat falls under local conservation laws: whereas wetlands may be protected, the surrounding terrestrial regions, which semiaquatic reptiles rely on just as much, are frequently left open for destruction. Additional factors include the introduction of invasive species, evironmental pollution, climate change, disease and humans.

According to Gibbons and his colleagues, people are in fact endangering reptiles on many fronts. Cars run over the animals; human food wastes lure predators into fragile ecosystems; and commercial uses of reptiles are often not sustainable practices. The animals are frequently harvested for pets, food and use in folk medicines in such great numbers that the populations from which they come cannot recover. This is a particularly serious issue for those species that take many years to reach maturity.

It is difficult for herpetologists to evaluate just how dire the situation is at the moment because many reptile populations haven't been monitored rigorously--or at all--for long periods of time. Further complicating matters, reptiles often cover large amounts of territory and are by nature fairly clandestine creatures, so even drastic declines can be hard to notice. But it is definitely happening. "Current evidence suggests that these declines constitute a worldwide crises," Gibbons declares, and the best stance for conservation efforts is to "assume the worst" while scientists gather more data.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe