Discerning the Unseeable

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

NOBODY has ever seen an extrasolar planet--although 20 have now been identified--much less another solar system. Even when they are orbiting nearby stars, the feeble light reflected from planets is overwhelmed by the flood of illumination from the host star.

So astronomers identify planets indirectly, by measuring the way they influence the motion of their parent stars. As an object orbits a star, its gravitational pull causes the star to wobble back and forth. That motion creates a periodic displacement, or Doppler shift, in the spectrum of the star as seen from the earth. The light from a receeding star shifts toward the red; that from a star approaching, toward blue.

Using sensitive spectrophotometers, such as those operated by the Lick Observatory and AFOE planet search programs, researchers examine spectra for the tiny displacements that could denote the presence of planets. The Doppler technique can reveal the orbit and the minimum mass of an orbiting body, but no details of its nature. But, despite the technique's sensitivity, the faint signals from planets the size of our Earth are still too small to be detected.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Image: San Francisco State University
Back to Significant Others

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe