New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Dissecting a Dinosaur's Bite

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

With the help of a sophisticated engineering tool, researchers have unlocked the secrets of one dinosaur's bite. The new work, published today in the journal Nature, sheds light on the feeding behavior of Allosaurus, a Jurassic predator about which fairly little is known.

Paleontologist Emily Rayfield of the University of Cambridge and her colleagues employed a technique often used to test the strength of bridges--finite-element analysis (FEA)--to create a digital model of Allosaurus's skull. They then used the computer simulation to explore how the bone would have responded to stresses transmitted during feeding. Even though the carnivorous biped sported a mouthful of sabre-like teeth, the team found that the beast actually had a relatively weak bite--far weaker than that of its mighty cousin T. rex. The analysis revealed that although the dinosaur's skull would have been able to withstand considerable impact, its teeth would not have been able to survive heavy loading.

Rayfield and her colleagues suggest that the seemingly paradoxical combination of a strong skull and a weak bite is an adaptation to a certain feeding strategy similar to that seen in Komodo dragons. Whereas T. rex inflicted a fatal bite with its powerful, crushing jaws, Allosaurus may have lunged head-on into its prey, delivering a high-impact bite in a manner akin to a person wielding a hatchet, and then sliced flesh away on retracting.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Allosaurus may have 'traded' a heavy skull and bite strength for greater speed and mobility of upper-jaw impact in order to capture lighter and more agile forms such as ornithopod dinosaurs," the team writes. "Allosaurus might have ambushed larger, more dangerous prey (for example, stegosaurs and sauropods) by inflicting a sudden devastating high-impact attack bite before the defender could retaliate."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe