Dissecting Happiness

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Although it might be nice to have piles of money or run with the in crowd, new research confirms that neither of these will provide that universally yearned for feeling of happiness. Rather, things like self-esteem and a sense of closeness with others appear to lead to ultimate satisfaction, according to a report in the February Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

To ascertain which of the 10 basic psychological feelings people find most important, Kennon M. Sheldon, a University of Missouri-Columbia psychologist, and his colleagues conducted three studies of different groups of U.S. college students. Participants in the first study were asked to describe the most personally satisfying event they had experienced during the last month. Those in the second group considered the same event, but from the last week. The third group of students reflected on the most satisfying event of the semester, and also the most unsatisfying event in that period. Results from the three groups proved fairly consistent, with autonomy, competence, relatedness and self-esteem topping the list of psychological needs.

Descriptions of the most unsatisfying event revealed that a lack of those four needs figured prominently, as did the lack of security. "It appears that when things go wrong," the authors note, "people may strongly wish for the safety and predictability that they often take for granted."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe