DNA Sequencing Speeds Up

Getty Images/iStockphoto Thinkstock Images (MARS)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Begun in 1990, the sequencing of the human genome was a daunting task that took some 13 years to complete. Large-scale DNA-sequencing projects are now more commonplace, so scientists are investigating new approaches in order to save time and money. A report published online by the journal Nature describes one such method that is 100 times faster than conventional ones.

The novel sequencing technique, designed by Jonathan M. Rothberg of 454 Life Sciences Corp. in Branford, Conn., and his colleagues, uses tiny fiber-optic reaction vessels that measure just 55 micrometers deep and 50 micrometers across--a slide containing 1.6 million wells takes up just 60 square millimeters. The set up allows for the amplification and sequencing of hundreds of thousands of DNA molecules simultaneously. Using light to measure the reactions, tests of the apparatus indicate that it can sequence 25 million bases in a single four-hour run with greater than 99 percent accuracy.

To compare the approach to standard procedures, one member of the research team successfully sequenced and assembled the entire genome of the parasitic bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium, which includes 580,069 base pairs, in a single run on the new machine. The results cover 96 percent of the genome with 99.96 percent accuracy. The authors conclude that the continued miniaturization of fiber optics suggests that in the future, this technique could become even faster when more sequencing wells can fit in a given area.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe