DNA-shredding Bacteria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: MARK PALLEN and NICK LOMAN

The most common culprit of food poisoning in the U.S. is a bacterium called Campylobacter jejuni(right). And researchers from Yale University have now uncovered its secret weapon: a small molecule that leaves a cell's DNA in shreds.

It was already known that the bacterium makes a toxin called CDT, which consists of three different proteins. In this recent study, the scientists introduced these proteins separately into cells and found that only one of them, CdtB, had a toxic effect. As they report in today¿s issue of Science, the protein left the cells' nuclei, which contain the DNA, in pieces. At lower amounts, it made the cells enlarge, similar to the effect of the CDT toxin.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When the researchers compared the gene sequence encoding CdtB with other genes, they found it had striking similarity to a DNA-shredding enzyme called DNase I. So they mutated the CdtB-gene in an area that renders DNase I dysfunctional, and found that the change had the same effect: the mutant CdtB protein no longer led to fragmented cell nuclei. Also, when they mixed the mutant protein together with the two other toxin components, cells remained unharmed, whereas the mix of all three normal proteins made them enlarge. Presumably, CdtB damages the DNA first, which only becomes visible when there is a lot of the protein. Because of this damage, the cells stop dividing and enlarge before they ultimately die.

Food poisoning is bad enough, but when the attacker damages the DNA of the intestinal cells, it can even become dangerous: if these cells survive mutated, intestinal cancer may result.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe