New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

DNA-shredding Bacteria

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: MARK PALLEN and NICK LOMAN

The most common culprit of food poisoning in the U.S. is a bacterium called Campylobacter jejuni(right). And researchers from Yale University have now uncovered its secret weapon: a small molecule that leaves a cell's DNA in shreds.

It was already known that the bacterium makes a toxin called CDT, which consists of three different proteins. In this recent study, the scientists introduced these proteins separately into cells and found that only one of them, CdtB, had a toxic effect. As they report in today¿s issue of Science, the protein left the cells' nuclei, which contain the DNA, in pieces. At lower amounts, it made the cells enlarge, similar to the effect of the CDT toxin.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When the researchers compared the gene sequence encoding CdtB with other genes, they found it had striking similarity to a DNA-shredding enzyme called DNase I. So they mutated the CdtB-gene in an area that renders DNase I dysfunctional, and found that the change had the same effect: the mutant CdtB protein no longer led to fragmented cell nuclei. Also, when they mixed the mutant protein together with the two other toxin components, cells remained unharmed, whereas the mix of all three normal proteins made them enlarge. Presumably, CdtB damages the DNA first, which only becomes visible when there is a lot of the protein. Because of this damage, the cells stop dividing and enlarge before they ultimately die.

Food poisoning is bad enough, but when the attacker damages the DNA of the intestinal cells, it can even become dangerous: if these cells survive mutated, intestinal cancer may result.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe