Do Selfies Make You Look Bad?

A new study finds they are not as flattering as we think

GETTY IMAGES

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

People regularly see themselves as more attractive and talented than others see them. Now the rise of selfies has deepened the hue of this rose-tinted mirror. According to new research, people who take frequent self-portraits think these pics put them in the best light, even when others see selfies as, frankly, unflattering.

For this study, published online in April in Social Psychological and Personality Science, college students were asked to take a selfie in the laboratory, and a researcher took a nearly identical picture of them. Then the students and a group of online participants of all ages rated the images.

The researchers found that people who regularly take selfies thought that they looked more attractive and likable in their selfies than in the photographs taken by an experimenter. Other observers, however, rated them as less likable and more narcissistic in their selfies as compared with the nonselfies. For students who do not usually take selfies, it was a triple whammy: in addition to being seen as less likable and more narcissistic, their selfies were also judged to be less attractive.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


People who do not regularly take selfies did not have the same bias about their own snaps as did regular selfie takers, perhaps because the selfie-indulgent have internalized positive feedback for their shots on social media, the researchers theorize. They suggest that selfie takers may also enjoy knowing they were the photographer because they have positive illusions about their photography skills, too.

“Exercise some caution when posting a selfie,” says Daniel Re, a researcher at the University of Toronto and the paper's primary author. “It might not be perceived the way you intend.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe