Do the telomeres in cancer cells shrink?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Jerry W. Shay, a professor of cell biology at the University of Texas Southwest Medical Center and a leading telomerase researcher, offers this explanation:

Image: COURTESY OF JERRY SHAY
TELOMERES, seen here in red, cap the ends of chromosomes and erode with each successive division in normal cells. Cancer cells, however, maintain their telomeres with the help of the enzyme telomerase.

In 1972 geneticist James Watson discovered that, because of the way DNA replicates, our chromosomes have a problem¿one he called the "end replication problem." Each time a normal human cell divides, its telomeres¿enzyme caps that protect the ends of the chromosomes like plastic shoelace tips¿get progressively shorter. Eventually the telomeres dwindle to the point where the cell can no longer replicate.

A hallmark of most cancer cells is that they divide indefinitely. In order to do so, they must figure out a way around these short telomeres. As it turns out, the cells accomplish this feat by reactivating an enzyme called telomerase, which adds new telomeres onto the ends of chromosomes to compensate for the end replication problem. Telomerase is expressed during early human development but remains silent in almost all adult tissues. Human cancers, in contrast, express telomerase, which maintains their telomeres at a stable and usually very short level. Because of this fact, the cells can replicate indefinitely.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Inhibition of telomerase may thus represent a novel anticancer therapeutic approach. If we can suppress telomerase, we may be able to drive cancer cells into a growth arrest state. Many laboratories, including my own, are studying this at the present time, and the preliminary results are very encouraging.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe