Do Vibrations Help Us Smell?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

How does the sense of smell work? Today two competing camps of scientists are at war over this very question. And the more controversial theory has received important new experimental confirmation.

At issue is whether our noses use delicate quantum mechanisms for sensing the vibrations of odor molecules, aka odorants. Spectroscopes in chemistry and forensics laboratories do this all the time; the machines bounce infrared light off mystery materials to reveal the telltale vibrations that the light provokes. Olfaction might do the same by using tiny currents of electrons instead of infrared photons.

This explanation runs counter to the predominant theory of smell today, which holds that the millions of different odorants in the world are like puzzle pieces. Noses contain scores of different kinds of receptors that each prefer to bind with specific types of pieces. A receptor that is set to bind to a molecule called limonene, for example, sends a signal to the brain when it finds that compound, which is one of the cues behind the smell of citrus.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Yet here's a twist: many odorant molecules contain one or more hydrogen atoms. And hydrogen comes in three forms, each chemically very similar to the others. But those different isotopes of hydrogen have different masses and strongly affect how a molecule vibrates. So deuterium, whose nucleus contains both a proton and a neutron (twice as heavy as the most common kind of hydrogen, which has just a proton), might help scientists discriminate between the proposed vibration and standard chemical binding theories of olfaction.

According to research published in January in PLOS ONE, human noses can sniff out the presence of deuterium in some odorants. Specifically, experimenters found that regular musk molecules smell different from ones that contain deuterium. Study co-author Luca Turin of the Alexander Fleming Biomedical Sciences Research Center in Greece says the finding represents a victory for the vibration theory.

Others disagree. Eric Block, professor of chemistry at the University at Albany, S.U.N.Y., points to previous work showing that human noses cannot smell the presence of deuterium in acetophenone (which smells sweet to humans). Turin proposes an explanation for the failure: deuterated acetophenone has relatively few deuteriums in it and thus may generate a vibrational signal that is too weak for humans to detect. Block says Turin can't have it both ways, and so the controversy continues.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe