Fact or Fiction?

Do You Need Only Half Your Brain?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The operation known as a hemispherectomy—the removal of half the brain—sounds too radical to ever consider, much less perform. In the past century, however, surgeons have done it hundreds of times for disorders that cannot be controlled any other way. Perhaps surprisingly, the surgery has no apparent effect on personality or memory. Does that mean a person needs only half a brain? Yes and no. People can survive and function pretty well after the procedure, but they will have some physical disabilities.

The first known hemispherectomy was performed on a dog in 1888 by German physiologist Friedrich Goltz. Neurosurgeon Walter Dandy pioneered the use of the procedure on humans at Johns Hopkins University in 1923, operating on a patient who had a brain tumor. (That man lived for more than three years before ultimately succumbing to cancer.)

In 1938, after performing a hemispherectomy on a 16-year-old girl, Canadian neurosurgeon Kenneth McKenzie reported that it could stop debilitating seizures. And today brain surgeons perform hemispherectomies on patients who undergo dozens of seizures daily that resist all medication and stem from conditions that primarily afflict one hemisphere. “These disorders are often progressive and damage the rest of the brain if not treated,” explains neurosurgeon Gary W. Mathern of the University of California, Los Angeles.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The surgery takes two forms. Anatomical hemispherectomies involve the removal of an entire hemisphere, whereas functional hemispherectomies take out only parts of a hemisphere—as well as severing the corpus callosum, the fiber bundle that connects the two halves of the brain. The evacuated cavity is left empty, filling up with cerebrospinal fluid over time.

Doctors often prefer anatomical hemispherectomies because “leaving even a little bit of brain behind can lead seizures to return,” says neurologist John Freeman of Johns Hopkins, which specializes in the procedure. On the other hand, functional hemispherectomies, which U.C.L.A. surgeons usually perform, lead to less blood loss. “Our patients are usually under two years of age, so they have less blood to lose,” Mathern says. Neurosurgeons have performed the functional operation on children as young as three months old. In these tiny patients, memory and personality develop normally.

Most Johns Hopkins hemispherectomy patients are older than five years. A recent study found that 86 percent of the 111 children who underwent the procedure at Johns Hopkins between 1975 and 2001 are either seizure-free or have nondisabling seizures that do not require medication. Another study found that children who underwent a hemispherectomy often improved academically once their seizures stopped. “One was champion bowler of her class, one was chess champion of his state, and others are in college doing very nicely,” Freeman notes.

But Can You Dance?

Of course, removal of half the brain does have its downside—notably significant loss of function on one side of the body. “You can walk, run—some dance or skip—but you lose use of the hand opposite of the hemisphere that was removed,” Freeman says. Vision is impaired as well.

Also, if the left side of the brain is taken out, most people have problems with their speech. But, Freeman notes, the younger a person is when he or she undergoes hemispherectomy, the less speech disability the person is likely to have.

Mathern and his colleagues have recently conducted the first functional magnetic resonance imaging study into hemispherectomy patients, investigating how their brain changes with physical rehabilitation. Probing how the remaining cerebral hemispheres of these patients acquire language, sensory, motor and other functions “could shed a great deal of light on the brain's plasticity, or ability to change,” Freeman observes. Still, he says, hemispherectomy is among the most drastic kinds of brain surgery and is “something that one does only when the alternatives are worse.”

Charles Q. Choi is a frequent contributor to Scientific American. His work has also appeared in The New York Times, Science, Nature, Wired, and LiveScience, among others. In his spare time, he has traveled to all seven continents.

More by Charles Q. Choi
Scientific American Magazine Vol 298 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Do You Need Only Half Your Brain?” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 298 No. 3 (), p. 104
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0308-104

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe