Dolphin Die-Off Tied to Virus Related to Human Measles

NOAA scientists confirm killer of dead bottlenose dolphins washing up along East Coast

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Federal scientists say a virus related to human measles is likely to blame for the mass die-off of bottlenose dolphins along the East Coast. Based on the last outbreak, they say it could affect the species until next year.

Since July 1, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) says 333 dead or sickly bottlenose dolphins have washed up from North Carolina to New York. That's over nine times the historical average for strandings during this period. The bulk of those reports — 174 of them — have come from Virginia.

NOAA officials had already declared it an "unusual mortality event" and had been taking samples from dead dolphins to investigate the cause. So far, 32 of 33 samples tested for morbillivirus were either suspect (25 cases) or confirmed positive (seven cases), researchers with the agency told reporters Tuesday (Aug. 27).  [10 Deadly Diseases That Hopped Across Species]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Dolphin morbillivirus is related to other morbilliviruses that can cause measles in people or canine distemper in dogs, but the pathogens are unlikely to spill over to other species. Bottlenose dolphins catch the disease through direct contact with infected dolphins and respiratory particles, or those particles that travel through the respiratory tract from the air dolphins breathe. Infected animals may develop lesions, brain infections and pneumonia, as well as secondary bacterial, viral and/or fungal infections.

The same disease caused a deadly outbreak 26 years ago when more than 700 dead bottlenose dolphins were found from New Jersey to Florida between June 1987 and May 1988.

"We're expecting that if indeed this plays out the way that die-off occurred that we're looking at mortalities being higher and the moribillivirus spreading southward and likely continuing until spring of 2014," Teri Rowles, National Marine Mammal Stranding Coordinator with NOAA Fisheries, said during a conference call today (Aug. 27).

Researchers suspect this summer's rash of morbillivirus began with a young population that was born after the 1987/1988 outbreak and had no natural defenses against the disease.

"Many of the dolphins younger than 26 years old have limited to no immunity to this virus," Rowles said. "So if the virus is introduced, they don't have the traditional antibodies to protect them."

That also means as the outbreak progresses, the dolphins that survive will build up immunity, and the number of strandings should hopefully decrease.

"It will probably end when the number of susceptible animals dwindles," virologist Jerry Saliki, of the University of Georgia, told reporters. "Not all infected animals will die. As the outbreak proceeds, the number of immune animals will increase."

As they continue to monitor the outbreak, the researchers say they are investigating other factors that may have made the animals more susceptible to the virus. Rowles said they will test for contaminants to see if dolphins with high levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) or other man-made toxins were affected more severely.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

LiveScience is one of the biggest and most trusted popular science websites operating today, reporting on the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world.

More by LiveScience

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe