Don't Go with the Flow

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS

Understanding how particles mix in fluids has a number of important applications--among them modeling chemical reactions and cloud dynamics. Normally the particles--like creamer in your morning coffee--will follow the fluid's flow; in your mug, they trail the eddy created by your spoon. Similarly, in a cylindrical lab container--in which spinning disks mix the contents--added particles tend to form a doughnut-shaped swirl. Some particles, however, orbit around the doughnut's surface, passing the same spots again and again. Large tracer particles, for instance, will concentrate along these specific trajectories.

Now Fernando Muzzio and his colleagues at Rutgers University have discovered by accident another way in which particles are forced to follow specific trajectories--namely, if their buoyancies or densities gradually change. They report their findings in the February 12th issue of Physical Review Letters.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers injected two different fluorescent dyes into a cylindrical mixer filled with glycerine. The green dye, which was neutrally bouyant, soon formed the familiar doughnut. But the red dye, which was slightly less dense, took its own course (see image). After additional experimentation and computer simulation, the team figured out what was going on: as the red dye floats up in the glycerine, it spreads and becomes less buoyant. As a result, the dye particles become trapped in horizontal swirls of glycerine, unable to rise any farther.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe