New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Dream Weavers

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina discusses the highlights of the issue

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For as long as I can remember, I have lived in two worlds. One is the environment that I physically occupy. In that reality, I am a wife and mom who lives in the suburbs and has a really interesting editorial job. But in my inner world, things change fluidly. When I was a shy little girl, for instance, I imagined I was bold and outgoing; I could tell great jokes, and everybody would laugh. Sometimes I would conjure a new place—even outer space. Why not? In my secret world, I could go anywhere I pleased and be anything I wanted to be.

I had no idea, until much later, that not everybody has such elaborate fantasies—or that they could be problematic for some people who get too engrossed. Still, as Josie Glausiusz writes in this issue’s cover story, “Living in a Dream World,” people generally spend about 30 percent of their days with their minds elsewhere. Daydreaming can inspire us and help us be more creative. But like an overdose of honey, it can also be cloying or smother us if we overindulge.

Apart from our waking visions, our internal perceptions can trap us into not accepting reality. One such case is people who experience the “imposter phenomenon.” As Birgit Spinath writes in “Great Pretenders,” such individuals believe their achievements are actually undeserved. Although all of us tend to grant a measure of power to external factors over our successes and failures, victims of imposter thinking go much further. They are in constant fear of being found out as swindlers.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Daydreaming and imposter thinking are hidden shades of our personalities. But what about how we look to the world? “You Are What You Like,” proclaims Christiane Gelitz. We reveal a lot about ourselves by our cultural preferences: by our music choices, our art tastes and even how we decorate our surroundings. As opaque as we sometimes perceive ourselves to be to others, we are often endearingly transparent as a species.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 22 Issue 1This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 22 No. 1 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0311-1

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe