Dream Weavers

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina discusses the highlights of the issue

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For as long as I can remember, I have lived in two worlds. One is the environment that I physically occupy. In that reality, I am a wife and mom who lives in the suburbs and has a really interesting editorial job. But in my inner world, things change fluidly. When I was a shy little girl, for instance, I imagined I was bold and outgoing; I could tell great jokes, and everybody would laugh. Sometimes I would conjure a new place—even outer space. Why not? In my secret world, I could go anywhere I pleased and be anything I wanted to be.

I had no idea, until much later, that not everybody has such elaborate fantasies—or that they could be problematic for some people who get too engrossed. Still, as Josie Glausiusz writes in this issue’s cover story, “Living in a Dream World,” people generally spend about 30 percent of their days with their minds elsewhere. Daydreaming can inspire us and help us be more creative. But like an overdose of honey, it can also be cloying or smother us if we overindulge.

Apart from our waking visions, our internal perceptions can trap us into not accepting reality. One such case is people who experience the “imposter phenomenon.” As Birgit Spinath writes in “Great Pretenders,” such individuals believe their achievements are actually undeserved. Although all of us tend to grant a measure of power to external factors over our successes and failures, victims of imposter thinking go much further. They are in constant fear of being found out as swindlers.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Daydreaming and imposter thinking are hidden shades of our personalities. But what about how we look to the world? “You Are What You Like,” proclaims Christiane Gelitz. We reveal a lot about ourselves by our cultural preferences: by our music choices, our art tastes and even how we decorate our surroundings. As opaque as we sometimes perceive ourselves to be to others, we are often endearingly transparent as a species.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
SA Mind Vol 22 Issue 1This article was published with the title “From the Editor” in SA Mind Vol. 22 No. 1 (), p. 1
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0311-1

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe