New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Drinking Is No Joke

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Alcoholics have trouble understanding jokes, but they may be missing out on much more than a chance to laugh.

German neuroscientists showed 29 alcoholics and 29 healthy control subjects the introduction to a joke and then a choice of punch lines—only one of which made logical sense and was funny. Whereas 92 percent of the nondrinkers chose the correct punch line, only 68 percent of the drinkers did. “The ability to understand jokes is an example of complex social cognition,” explains Jennifer Uekermann of Ruhr University Bochum. “It involves detecting incongruity—what's wrong or funny about the story—and putting oneself in another's place.”

An alcoholic's problems with social cues are consistent with the “frontal lobe hypothesis,” which postulates that damage to the prefrontal cortex—known to be vulnerable to alcohol's toxic effects—leads to behavioral deficits. Most other studies of alcoholics’ brain function have concentrated on perceptual problems caused by such damage, Uekermann says. But when a person has deficits in social cognition, he or she has difficulty getting along with and working with other people. A better understanding of how problem drinkers are impaired could help improve rehabilitation programs for alcoholics.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe