Drought May Have Brought on Demise of the Maya

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Why the Mayan society, which prospered in the eighth and ninth centuries in Central America, collapsed remains a mystery. Numerous theories, from overpopulation and class warfare to climate change and environmental stresses, have been put forward over the years to explain the downfall. Now the most detailed sediment analysis yet, published in the current issue of the journal Science, further implicates climatic variation. It suggests that a prolonged dry spell, punctuated by three more severe droughts, could have been chiefly to blame for the civilization's demise.

Gerald H. Haug, now at Potsdam's Geoscience Center, and his colleagues studied a sediment core collected from the Cariaco Basin, located off the coast of northern Venezuela. By analyzing the levels of titanium, which is indicative of the amount of rainfall, the scientists determined that the area around the Yucatán peninsula (now part of Mexico) suffered three periods of very low rainfall around A.D. 810, 860 and 910. The droughts were relatively short-lived, lasting between three and nine years, the authors report. They note that these findings agree with archaeological evidence that suggests that Mayan society collapsed in three phases over the same time period.

The latest results will not be the last word on the Mayan collapse, however. Indeed, the authors note that "no one archaeological model is likely to capture completely a phenomenon as complex as the Mayan decline." No doubt scientists will be uncovering the secrets of this sophisticated society for years to come.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe