New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Drug Boosts Sense of Touch

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sense of touch can be significantly improved using drug therapy, new research suggests. According to a report published in the current issue of the journal Science, amphetamines administered in conjunction with finger stimulation can increase a fingertip's sensitivity by 23 percent. The findings could lead to treatment options for the elderly or injured who have difficulty performing tasks that require a fine touch--buttoning a shirt, for example.

Hubert R. Dinse of Ruhr-University Bochum in Germany and his colleagues outfitted 16 subjects with small discs on the tip of the right index finger that applied subtle pressure for three hours. Such stimulation triggers what is known as co-activation, in which additional neurons are recruited to the brain's somatosensory cortex to process the increased amount of tactile information. Scientists can quantify the sense of touch by determining the distance between two pins at which a person can no longer distinguish that there are two separate points pressing on his fingertip. The researchers found that after stimulation subjects performed 12 percent better on average than people who had not worn the disk. What is more, when participants were also given amphetamines, this improvement doubled.

The enhanced sense of touch only lasted about 24 hours, the team reports, but additional stimulation raised it again. Dinse notes that for rehabilitation regimens the improved sensory reception would need to be more durable and long-lasting, and his team is now investigating possible ways to achieve this.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe