Drug Boosts Sense of Touch

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The sense of touch can be significantly improved using drug therapy, new research suggests. According to a report published in the current issue of the journal Science, amphetamines administered in conjunction with finger stimulation can increase a fingertip's sensitivity by 23 percent. The findings could lead to treatment options for the elderly or injured who have difficulty performing tasks that require a fine touch--buttoning a shirt, for example.

Hubert R. Dinse of Ruhr-University Bochum in Germany and his colleagues outfitted 16 subjects with small discs on the tip of the right index finger that applied subtle pressure for three hours. Such stimulation triggers what is known as co-activation, in which additional neurons are recruited to the brain's somatosensory cortex to process the increased amount of tactile information. Scientists can quantify the sense of touch by determining the distance between two pins at which a person can no longer distinguish that there are two separate points pressing on his fingertip. The researchers found that after stimulation subjects performed 12 percent better on average than people who had not worn the disk. What is more, when participants were also given amphetamines, this improvement doubled.

The enhanced sense of touch only lasted about 24 hours, the team reports, but additional stimulation raised it again. Dinse notes that for rehabilitation regimens the improved sensory reception would need to be more durable and long-lasting, and his team is now investigating possible ways to achieve this.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe