Drugs for Taming Tourette's?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Though it has been known for more than a century, the neuropsychiatric disorder Tourette's syndrome (TS) remains difficult to treat. But findings from two clinical trials described in this month's issue of the journal Neurology may help point the way to new therapies.

In the first study, Johns Hopkins University neurologist Harvey Singer and his colleagues found that the drug baclofen¿a muscle relaxant and antispastic long thought to effectively diminish the verbal and muscular tics associated with TS¿does not in fact do so significantly in children. What it does apparently do is somehow make patients feel less "impaired" by the tics. And that, Singer concluded, did improve their overall condition, because TS patients often suffer from other problems such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The second study tested the effects of injecting botulinum toxin into muscles affected by tics in adult TS patients. The thought was that because the toxin paralyzes the nerve in the muscle, it would eliminate the tic. (Botulinum toxin has been used in this way cosmetically to treat wrinkles.) The participants, reports Anthony E. Lang of Toronto Western Hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, experienced on average a 39 percent reduction in the number of tics per minute. Placebo recipients, in contrast, showed a 6 percent increase tics per minute. Unlike baclofen, however, botulinum toxin did not lead to overall improvement in TS symptoms.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"Learning which kinds of drugs suppress the tics the best may enable us to develop more effective treatments in the future," Singer remarks. "Testing medications in a rigorous setting represents the first step in identifying better therapies for TS."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe