Drugs from a Sloth's Back

Researchers find potential cures on the backs of sloths

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Treatments for human diseases often come from unexpected places. Several years ago microbiologist Sarah Higginbotham was talking with an ecologist colleague about how she looks for bioactive organisms—those that produce substances that inhibit the growth of other organisms. “When I told him I look for places where lots of organisms live together, he said, ‘Sloths sound perfect,’” she says.

Sloths are microbial jackpots because they move so slowly and infrequently and because their fur contains microscopic grooves that create a perfect breeding ground for algae, fungi, bacteria, cockroaches and caterpillars.

Interest piqued, Higginbotham, during a temporary research stay at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama, obtained hair samples from nine three-toed sloths—the famously sedentary, tree-dwelling mammals from Central and South America. From the samples, she identified 28 different fungal strains, several of which might represent new species. (Chemical testing could help determine whether they are in fact new species.) Higginbotham, now at Queen's University Belfast, and her colleagues published a paper in PLOS ONE confirming bioactivity in some of their fungal strains against the parasites that cause malaria and Chagas' disease, a breast cancer cell line and several types of harmful bacteria. In all, they discovered two dozen drug leads hiding in the fur of sloths.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American