Duplicitous Ducks

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Biologists have long known that when it comes to hatching eggs and raising the young, females in certain species often try to cheat, sneaking their eggs into the nests of other brooding females. This phenomenon, known as conspecific brood parasitism (CBP), is particularly widespread among ducks. Why the host female accepts eggs and raises chicks that are not her own, however, has remained enigmatic. Perhaps, it was reasoned, CBP might be explained through kin selection. That is, if the host is related to the transplanted chick, or parasite, she can enhance her own reproductive fitness by promoting the survival of her relatives. Now, more than 15 years after G¿teborg University zoologist Malte Andersson proposed that idea, he and his colleague Matti ¿hlund have provided evidence to support it in a report published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The researchers examined relatedness among female goldeneye ducks, using a novel technique of so-called protein fingerprinting. From each egg in a clutch, they sampled a small amount of the egg protein albumin (without affecting the hatching success of the egg), which is maternally derived, and generated a pattern of bands, or fingerprints, unique to that chick. Andersson and ¿hlund were then able to look at patterns of relatedness by comparing the various fingerprints. Statistical analyses showed that hosts and parasites were in fact often related. Whether the host and parasite recognize each other as kin is not entirely clear. It may be that because the females tend to return to their birth sites year after year to nest, parasites might be depositing their eggs in the nests of relatives just by chance. But the researchers suggest that a mechanism for kin recognition is likely.

Aside from CBP, waterfowl display a wide range of breeding systems, including solitary nesting and communal nesting. According to Bruce E. Lyon and John McA. Eadie, who wrote a commentary accompanying the PNAS report, "The challenge now will be to obtain the necessary data on relatedness, ecological constraints and the costs and benefits of these many alternatives. Conspecific brood parasitism¿the strange phenomenon noted by waterfowl biologists half a century ago¿may well turn out to be a fascinating and important link in the evolution of avian breeding systems."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe