The debris and combustion particles resulting from the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, have compromised lung function in surviving rescue workers. Medical researchers are studying members of the Fire Department of New York City (FDNY), who are tested regularly to see how much air they can exhale through a tube.
Number of exposed FDNY rescue workers: 11,766
Number who arrived before or during the collapse: 1,660
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Two days later: 8,185
Three or more days later: 1,921
Median liters of air workers could exhale in one second during their last test before 9/11: 4.30
During their first test after 9/11: 3.93
Percent who had below-normal capacity before 9/11: 6.8
After 9/11: 15.3
Equivalent years of aging for lungs, one year after 9/11: 12
SOURCE: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, August 2006
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
