Data Points: Dust Devil

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The debris and combustion particles resulting from the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, have compromised lung function in surviving rescue workers. Medical researchers are studying members of the Fire Department of New York City (FDNY), who are tested regularly to see how much air they can exhale through a tube.

Number of exposed FDNY rescue workers: 11,766

Number who arrived before or during the collapse: 1,660


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Two days later: 8,185

Three or more days later: 1,921

Median liters of air workers could exhale in one second during their last test before 9/11: 4.30

During their first test after 9/11: 3.93

Percent who had below-normal capacity before 9/11: 6.8

After 9/11: 15.3

Equivalent years of aging for lungs, one year after 9/11: 12

SOURCE: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, August 2006

Scientific American Magazine Vol 295 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Dust Devil” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 295 No. 4 (), p. 34
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1006-34a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe