New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Early Humans Ate Termites

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Though not a popular item in Western cuisine, termites are prized in other cultures. And with good reason: they represent a valuable source of protein and fat. In fact, a 100-gram serving of these insects provides 75 percent more calories than an equivalent amount of rump steak. Chimpanzees, too, feed on termites, as Jane Goodall first noted 40 years ago in Tanzania, when she watched a nearby chimpanzee pluck a blade of grass, trim it with care and dip the modified stem into a termite mound to fish for the insects. Now it appears that ancient hominids also had a taste for termites. According to a report published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, modified bones dated to between 1.8 and 1.1 million years old that were thought to represent tools for digging up tubers were instead used to dig into termite mounds.

Francesco d'Errico of the University of Bordeaux and Lucinda Backwell of the University of the Witwatersrand analyzed more than 23,000 animal bone fragments from two South African hominid fossil localities known as Swartkrans and Sterkfontein. Earlier studies had identified 69 of these bones as putative tools, but the new work added 16 others to the list. Comparing these 85 specimens at the microscopic level with bones known to have been altered by natural agencies like animal gnawing, water, wind and so forth, the team confirmed that the markings on the purported tools did not match those of the naturally modified examples. Moreover, turning to modern examples, d'Errico and Backwell showed that the orientation of the marks on tools used for digging tubers differed significantly from that seen on tools used for breaking into termite mounds. The wear pattern on the fossil bone tools, they observed, closely resembles the modern termiting tool pattern.

Two kinds of hominid remains have been reported from these South African sites: a robust form of Australopithecus and an early member of our own genus, Homo.Homo is generally thought to have consumed more meat than Australopithecus robustus, whose large, flat teeth would appear to reflect a vegetarian diet. But recent chemical analyses of the A. robustus remains from Swartkrans have revealed a surprisingly high level of so-called C4 dietary carbon, which indicates an unusually sizeable protein intake for a vegetarian species. Termite consumption might explain this find. Indeed, Pennsylvania State University researcher Pat Shipman points out in a commentary accompanying the PNAS report that the termite-eating aardvark has a carbon-isotopic signal rather similar to that for A. robustus. For now the identity of the tool users remains unknown. Only further research will reveal whether one or both of these early hominids dined on termites.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe