Early Modern Humans Feasted on Freshwater Fish and Fowl

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Hunting large terrestrial mammals might seem like a good subsistence strategy for Ice Age humans, but procuring small, aquatic creatures may have been more adaptive. Findings published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggest that by around 28,000 years ago, anatomically modern humans had started to exploit freshwater fish and fowl¿a dietary shift that may have given them a competitive edge over the Neandertals.

To reconstruct what early moderns ate, paleoanthropologist Erik Trinkaus of Washington University and his colleagues conducted chemical analyses of bone collagen samples from nine skeletons found in Europe and western Asia. They then compared these results with previously published findings from five European Neandertal specimens. Intriguingly, whereas the Neandertal samples indicate a diet dominated by large terrestrial herbivores, the early modern samples suggest a diet that incorporated inland freshwater fish, mollusks and birds. The data also imply that moderns were consistently exploiting small terrestrial animals, too.

This increased dietary breadth among moderns, the authors note, may have made them more resilient to natural pressures, such as seasonal and annual resource fluctuations. As such, it may well have helped the early modern human populations to expand and take over the Eurasian landscape.

The article "Who Were the Neandertals?" by Kate Wong (Scientific American, April 2000) is available for purchase at the Scientific American Archive

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe