Earthquake Warning System Sounds Alarm Seconds before Tremors Begin

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Most seismologists agree that predicting earthquakes days in advance is not going to be possible anytime soon. But borrowing from a system developed in Japan, scientists have devised an early warning system that will alert southern California residents seconds before a temblor begins.

When an earthquake strikes, the first pulse of energy to radiate from the point of origin comprises primary (p) waves. P waves travel about two times as fast as the secondary (s) waves that follow them and that carry the destructive, ground-shaking power characteristic of large quakes. The s waves are traditionally used to assess the magnitude of an event, but this information is only gleaned after the fact. The new system measures the first waves to arrive -- the p waves -- and thus provides warnings up to tens of seconds before the ground begins to move. That might seem like a negligible amount of time, but it's enough to take cover beneath a table or shut off gas lines and water mains.

Richard Allen of the University of Wisconsin and Hiroo Kanamori of the California Institute of Technology describe the system, called ElarmS, today in the journal Science. They developed ElarmS using historical earthquake data collected by an array of sensors spread throughout southern California. Measuring the frequency content of the p waves allowed Allen and Kanamori to figure out what the damage potential from a given quake might be at any point in the region. The system works because smaller earthquakes tend to send out high-frequency p waves whereas large-magnitude events radiate lower frequency energy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


ElarmS is designed to detect earthquakes small and large, because "only if it works for small magnitude events can we be sure the system is operational," Allen says. "If we're only looking at magnitude-6 earthquakes we'd only be testing every 30 years or so, and that's not practical." Now those seismologists that run southern California's already-established network of sensors, TriNet, are integrating Allen and Kanamori's computer program into their system. ElarmS will be tested using real-time data from small earthquakes over the coming years. Allen believes it will be most useful in developing safer automated transportation systems, buildings and city infrastructure that can be programmed to react to incoming p waves. "It is perhaps not reasonable to expect people to respond to an alarm they hear once every 30 years," he says, "but we have the potential now to build infrastructure that responds to these warnings and protects occupants."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe