New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Earth's Elusive Mantle Plumes Detected At Last

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Using detailed seismic data, scientists have obtained the clearest picture yet of the earth's inner workings. The images provide long-awaited direct evidence for mantle plumes--large columns of heat emanating from the planet's interior--which were first predicted in the 1970s.

Raffaella Montelli of Princeton University and her colleagues analyzed findings from more than 3,000 seismographic stations around the world that had monitored movement of some 86,000 earthquakes since 1964. The speed at which the resulting seismic waves move through the earth depends in part on the temperature of the rock. Based on the observed differences in speed, the team assembled a 3-D temperature map of our planet that is described in a paper published online today by the journal Science. When the researchers compared the heat columns in their map to suspected sites of mantle plumes around the globe, they identified 32 plume locations. Some are well-known so-called hot spots, such as those underneath Tahiti and the Hawaiian islands, whereas others are new to science. "This is the first visual evidence that mantle plumes exist," Montelli says. The mapping technique is not foolproof, however. Some expected plumes--including one thought to lie underneath Yellowstone National Park--did not appear.

Montelli next plans to repeat the analysis using different types of seismic waves in order to refine the images. "Some plumes may be gaining strength and other may be fading," says Jason Morgan of Princeton, who first proposed the existence of mantle plumes but did not work on this project. "I don't know what will come of that, but it will be something interesting I am sure."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe