Ebola-Response Workers Killed in Attacks Force Withdrawal From Critical DRC Region

Four health care workers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo were killed in two attacks last week, and six others were injured

Health care workers at an Ebola treatment center in Butembo, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Four workers were killed in attacks elsewhere in the country last week.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Four people working for the Ebola containment effort in the Democratic Republic of the Congo were killed overnight Thursday in attacks on two locations where response teams were operating. Another six people were injured in the violence, forcing the World Health Organization and partner agencies to withdraw staff from a strategically critical location, a senior WHO official said.

The attack was the deadliest yet during a 17-month outbreak in which response workers have been frequently targeted for violence, said Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO’s emergencies program, speaking with reporters from Geneva.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus condemned the attacks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“These constant attacks must stop,” Tedros, as he is known, said in a video the WHO distributed on social media. “We call on everyone who has a role to play to end this cycle of violence.”

Three of the deaths occurred in an ambush of an accommodations camp housing 189 response workers at a place called Biakato Mines. In a separate attack at a coordination office in Mangina, a policeman guarding response workers was killed.

“We are heartbroken that they died as they worked to save others,” Ryan said.

To date, he said, there have been 386 attacks on response workers, with at least seven deaths and 77 injuries. Many other times, response teams have been caught in the crossfire between the multiple rebel groups that operate in the Ebola-affected area and the government and United Nations. peacekeeping troops in the region.

The latest violence dashes hopes that the outbreak might be in its final throes.

Months of intense effort to try to stop transmission of Ebola in the provinces of North Kivu and Ituri were paying off. There have been fewer cases to date in November than any month since the outbreak began. For perhaps the first time, the response teams had a good handle on where the virus was spreading, with 98% of cases occurring in two chains of transmission. Containment efforts were working.

“We were in a position where we were really starting to get on top of this virus,” Ryan said. “Ebola was retreating. And now it is likely to resurge. … When responders aren’t in the community, the virus spreads undetected and uninterrupted.”

This is the second largest Ebola outbreak ever, with more than 3,300 cases and 2,200 deaths. Though this one is almost 10 times smaller than the West African outbreak of 2014-2016, Ryan and others have called the North Kivu-Ituri outbreak the most difficult ever, occurring as it is in a region that is home to upwards of 8 million people and that has been mired in conflict for more than two decades.

Despite use of a highly effective vaccine and drugs that have been proven in this outbreak to reduce deaths, the response workers have struggled to gain the acceptance and assistance of people in affected communities.

Community resistance remains a problem at Lwemba, a health zone near Biakato Mines that is currently the place where most transmission is occurring. Even before the violence, response teams had encountered difficulties in Lwemba. The camp at Biakato Mines housed people who had been working in Lwemba. “Now without our teams on the ground, we have even less access,” Ryan said.

Violence earlier in the outbreak fueled spread of the Ebola virus, with a massive surge of cases in March, April, and May after multiple late February attacks on response operations, including two treatment centers that were razed.

Ryan was clearly bracing for the prospect that this pattern is about to be repeated. “We’ve seen the impact previously of long-term interruptions of operations,” he said, adding that it’s impossible to predict at this point how soon full response operations will be able to resume.

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on November 28 2019

Helen Branswell is STAT's infectious diseases and public health reporter. She comes from the Canadian Press, where she was the medical reporter for the past 15 years. Helen cut her infectious diseases teeth during Toronto's SARS outbreak in 2003 and spent the summer of 2004 embedded at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2010-11 she was a Nieman Global Health Fellow at Harvard, where she focused on polio eradication. Warning: Helen asks lots of questions.

More by Helen Branswell

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe