Ebola Vaccine Protects Primates

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: courtesy of the Centers for Disease Control

With its nightmarish symptoms and ferocious fatality rate, Ebola ranks among the most feared viruses. To make things worse, no antiviral drugs currently available have proven effective against it, and because scientists do not know where the virus resides between outbreaks, environmental control is impossible. Researchers have thus devoted considerable energy to developing an Ebola vaccine. Now it appears that they have made an important breakthrough. According to a report published today in the journal Nature, a team led by scientists from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed a vaccine that protects monkeys from lethal doses of the virus.

Previously developed vaccines had been shown to protect mice and guinea pigs from Ebola-like viruses. The new vaccine, however, works against an Ebola strain that infects humans. Immunization in this case takes the form of a one-two punch. Researchers first injected monkeys with chains of DNA coding for proteins from three strains of Ebola in order to develop immunity. Then, after a rest period, the monkeys received an injection containing a common-cold virus engineered to express Ebola proteins. The hope was that this second injection would boost their immunity by stimulating antibody production. In fact, the combination worked: of the four monkeys that received the vaccination prior to being infected with the Zaire strain of Ebola, none expressed any symptoms. Furthermore, three of them completely cleared the infection within two weeks. More than six months later all four were still symptom-free, with no detectable virus in their blood. In contrast, all four of the monkeys that were infected but not vaccinated developed symptoms, and three died in less than a week (the fourth was euthanized).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Whether the vaccine works against all three strains of Ebola remains to be seen. And in a commentary accompanying the Nature report Dennis R. Burton and Paul W.H.I. Parren of the Scripps Research Institute note that although the monkeys received lethal Ebola doses, those doses were still relatively small. "Previous studies have shown that antibody preparations that protect against low doses of virus may be ineffective against higher doses," they warn. "It will be crucial to know whether the vaccine strategy can protect against more substantial challenge."

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe