New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Effects of Smoking May Be Passed Down through Generations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The negative health effects of smoking are well documented, but new results suggest that the dangers for pregnant women may be even more far reaching than previously believed. Scientists have found that the grandchildren of women who smoked while they were pregnant may have up to double the risk of developing childhood asthma compared to grandchildren of women whose pregnancies were smoke-free.

Researchers led by Frank D. Gilliland of the University of Southern California (USC) analyzed data collected as part of the ongoing USC Children's Health Study. They interviewed the parents or guardians of 908 school-age children, 338 of whom had developed asthma by the age of five. They report in the April issue of the journal Chest that children of women who smoked while pregnant were 1.5 times as likely to develop asthma as the offspring of nonsmokers were. If both the mother and grandmother smoked during pregnancy, the risk increased to 2.6 times that of children of nonsmokers. Most surprising, even when a mother did not smoke while she was pregnant her child had nearly double the risk of developing asthma as a child from a smoke-free home if her mother had smoked during pregnancy. "This is the first study to show that if a woman smokes while she is pregnant, both her children and grandchildren may be more likely to have asthma as a result, " Gilliland says. "The findings suggest that smoking could have a long-term impact on a family's health that has never before been realized."

Further studies are needed to confirm the new transgenerational findings, the scientists say. For now, Gilliland explains, he and his colleagues "speculate that the damage that occurs affects the child's immune system and increases her susceptibility to asthma, which is then passed down to her children."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe