New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Killer Leaves Emerge from Plant-Butterfly Arms Race

Closely related plants evolved to sacrifice patches of their own leaves, destroying specific caterpillar eggs

Leaf dies around a butterfly egg.

Leaf dies around a butterfly egg.

Hans M. Smid

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A few plants in the cabbage and mustard family pay a dramatic price to fend off hungry caterpillars: they kill off patches of their own leaves where butterflies have laid eggs. Deprived of a living anchor, the eggs shrivel and die. These plants' egg-slaying abilities have been documented since at least the 1980s, but a new study shows they appear in just a few closely related plants in this family—and they are triggered only by certain butterfly species.

Nina Fatouros of Wageningen University in the Netherlands and her colleagues investigated 31 plant species in the target family. First, they dabbed the plants' leaves with liquid that had been exposed to egg material from a butterfly species known to lay eggs on them. Four closely related plant species reliably killed off the treated leaf patches. Further tests confirmed that the species with the most pronounced response only reacted strongly when the egg material came from one group of butterflies, Pieris, which lays eggs on these plants in the wild. This is “clear evidence” that specific butterfly species could have stimulated the evolution of the necrosis defense, Fatouros says. The researchers also tracked eggs laid by wild butterflies to confirm that the defense mechanism desiccates or detaches them. The work was detailed in New Phytologist.

“It's very unlikely that you find this by coincidence,” says University of Sheffield molecular plant biologist Jurriaan Ton, who was not involved in the study. He adds that the plants' relatedness, coupled with their exaggerated reaction to these butterflies, suggests a heated evolutionary “arms race” took place between the plants and insects.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This is the first study to my knowledge where they really looked at the appearance of this trait within a particular plant family,” says ecologist Julia Koricheva of Royal Holloway, University of London, who was also not involved in the work.

Future research could explore how recently the trait evolved, Fatouros says. She notes that arms races rarely end—and evidence suggests the butterflies may be fighting back. Some prefer to lay their eggs in tightly grouped clusters, making them less susceptible to the plants' strategy.

Chris Baraniuk is a freelance science and technology journalist based in the U.K. Besides Scientific American, his work has been published by New Scientist, the BBC, Wired and Quartz.

More by Chris Baraniuk
Scientific American Magazine Vol 324 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Butterfly Arms Race” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 324 No. 4 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0421-14b

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe