Killer Leaves Emerge from Plant-Butterfly Arms Race

Closely related plants evolved to sacrifice patches of their own leaves, destroying specific caterpillar eggs

Leaf dies around a butterfly egg.

Leaf dies around a butterfly egg.

Hans M. Smid

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A few plants in the cabbage and mustard family pay a dramatic price to fend off hungry caterpillars: they kill off patches of their own leaves where butterflies have laid eggs. Deprived of a living anchor, the eggs shrivel and die. These plants' egg-slaying abilities have been documented since at least the 1980s, but a new study shows they appear in just a few closely related plants in this family—and they are triggered only by certain butterfly species.

Nina Fatouros of Wageningen University in the Netherlands and her colleagues investigated 31 plant species in the target family. First, they dabbed the plants' leaves with liquid that had been exposed to egg material from a butterfly species known to lay eggs on them. Four closely related plant species reliably killed off the treated leaf patches. Further tests confirmed that the species with the most pronounced response only reacted strongly when the egg material came from one group of butterflies, Pieris, which lays eggs on these plants in the wild. This is “clear evidence” that specific butterfly species could have stimulated the evolution of the necrosis defense, Fatouros says. The researchers also tracked eggs laid by wild butterflies to confirm that the defense mechanism desiccates or detaches them. The work was detailed in New Phytologist.

“It's very unlikely that you find this by coincidence,” says University of Sheffield molecular plant biologist Jurriaan Ton, who was not involved in the study. He adds that the plants' relatedness, coupled with their exaggerated reaction to these butterflies, suggests a heated evolutionary “arms race” took place between the plants and insects.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“This is the first study to my knowledge where they really looked at the appearance of this trait within a particular plant family,” says ecologist Julia Koricheva of Royal Holloway, University of London, who was also not involved in the work.

Future research could explore how recently the trait evolved, Fatouros says. She notes that arms races rarely end—and evidence suggests the butterflies may be fighting back. Some prefer to lay their eggs in tightly grouped clusters, making them less susceptible to the plants' strategy.

Chris Baraniuk is a freelance science and technology journalist based in the U.K. Besides Scientific American, his work has been published by New Scientist, the BBC, Wired and Quartz.

More by Chris Baraniuk
Scientific American Magazine Vol 324 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Butterfly Arms Race” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 324 No. 4 (), p. 14
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0421-14b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe