Egg-Shaped Cisterns

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A correspondent—Thomas H. Johns, of Point Worthington, Miss.—informs jus that egg-shaped water cisterns are becoming very general in the South and West, and that they are far superior to the flat-bottomed cisterns common at the East. The following is a description of the method of constructing the above-named cisterns :— "The ground is excavated to a greater depth at the center than at the sides, and rounded gradually towards the greatest width or circumference ; this forms the bed of an inverted arch. The bricks are laid in hydraulic cement, by commencing at the center, and when the arch bottom is formed, the side walls and top arch are constructed in the usual way." Our correspondent has had large cisterns of twenty feet diameter built in this manner, and he assures us they never fail when the workmanship is properly executed. Flat bottomed cisterns we know often leak, but this we have considered to be the fault of the workmanship. The masons do not generally make the bottoms of cisterns sufficiently thick, nor do they use a requisite amount of cement for the bed. As the egg-shaped cisterns have no jdge or angle at the bottom, of course they ire capable of withstanding a greater amount )f hydorstatic pressure than the flat bottoms, md are, therefore, not so liable to leak.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 40This article was published with the title “Egg-Shaped Cisterns” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 40 (), p. 318
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican06121858-318b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe