Einstein Effect Reveals Icy Exoplanet

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An international team of scientists has discovered a massive new planet thanks to a phenomenon predicted by Einstein 70 years ago. Microlensing occurs when a star crosses in front of another star and bends the light from the more distant star, magnifying it like a lens. Astronomers recently took advantage of one such occlusion to get a better look at a red dwarf star roughly 9,000 light years from Earth, known as BLG-169. It appeared even brighter than expected. Only a star with a planet could have produced this effect, they say.

Based on the more than 1,000 images from the MDM Observatory in Arizona, team leader Andrew Gould of Ohio State University and his fellow astronomers calculate that this new planet has roughly 13 times the mass of Earth--making it about the size of Neptune--and orbits its star at about the distance of the asteroid belt in our own solar system. The researchers suspect that it is a cold, rocky world, with temperatures around -330 degrees Fahrenheit--perhaps a gas supergiant in the making that failed to attract or didn't have access to gaseous material.

Although it is only the fifth Neptune-size planet discovered (all in the last decade) this type of object may be fairly common in the Milky Way. Current theory predicts that smaller stars should encourage the formation of smaller planets and, because most stars in this galaxy are red dwarfs, such planets may be more common than the 170 or so Jupiter-size orbs discovered so far. "These icy super-Earths are pretty common--roughly 35 percent of all stars have them," Gould says. "The next step is to push the sensitivity of our detection methods down to reach Earth-mass planets, and microlensing is the best way to get there." A paper detailing the findings was published online earlier this week in Astrophysical Journal Letters.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe