New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Electrical Signals Key to Culturing Heart Tissue

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Heart attacks strike some 800,000 people in the U.S annually. Because heart tissue cannot regenerate after an injury, the damage inflicted on the cardiac muscle worsens over time. Scientists report in this week's online issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that they have successfully cultured working heart cells from rats. The feat should aid efforts to engineer patches for broken hearts.

Conventional culture methods don't work for heart cells--they tend to lose their shape and stop functioning properly. In the new work, the researchers placed cardiac cells from a rat onto a polymer scaffold and immersed the setup in a nutrient bath. The team then applied electrical signals, which were designed to mimic a beating heart, to the growing cells. After eight days, single cells were transformed into functional heart tissue with structure similar to that of mature cardiac tissue samples. In addition, the cells expressed cardiac proteins and showed a seven-fold increase in the amount they could contract compared with cells cultured without electrical stimulation.

The next step for the research team is to build a section of cardiac tissue that is thick enough for clinical applications. "The greatest challenge," lead author Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology says, "is to reproduce this with human cells, and test how all this works in the body."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe