Electronic Excitation on Metal Surfaces May Enable New Chemical Sensors

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image: UCSB

Although numerous industrial processes exploit the surfaces of solid catalysts to produce a variety of chemicals, scientists are still somewhat unclear as to what exactly goes on at the surface. One theory posits that the energy freed when a chemical binds to the surface is released as heat energy in the form of tiny vibrations of the surface molecules. Another hypothesis holds that the liberated energy is transferred to the electrons of the surface molecules, raising them to a higher energy level or exciting them. Direct experimental evidence for the latter model, however, did not exist¿until now.

Writing in the journal Science, Brian Gergen of the University of California, Santa Barbara, and colleagues describe a new chemical sensor made from a so-called Schottky diode¿a silicon wafer coated with a metal film only a one hundred-millionth of a meter thick. The researchers detected excited electrons (and the holes they left behind) produced by adsorption of chemicals onto the diode's surface. The sensor (right), in turn, captured the energized electrons and produced a measurable electrical signal, which the scientists deemed a chemicurrent.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new set-up differs from other types of thin-metal sensors currently in use, the authors note, because it detects molecules directly instead of measuring indirect changes caused by the presence of a chemical. What is more, different metal substrates show varying affinities for detecting particular molecules. So a combination of sensors that operate over a wide range of temperatures and are relatively inexpensive to produce could feasibly detect a variety of contaminants in a manufacturing environment.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe