Element 118 Dropped from Periodic Table

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBL) have formally retracted their claims for the discovery of the most massive chemical element. The synthesis of the "superheavy" element 118, comprising 118 protons and 175 neutrons, was announced in a 1999 paper in Physical Review Letters. The results appeared to confirm theories from the 1970s that predicted heightened stability for nuclei containing around 114 protons and 184 neutrons.

The retraction, published in the current Physical Review Letters, follows failures to reproduce the reported results by the Berkeley researchers and also by scientists in Germany and Japan. After re-analysis of the original data using different software codes, the team was forced to admit that their evidence for element 118 was spurious, prompting all but one of the original paper¿s authors to endorse the retraction.

The initial results had been seen as an early success for the newly constructed Berkeley Gas-filled Separator (BGS). The team bombarded a lead-208 target with neutron-rich krypton-86 ions, in an 88-inch Cyclotron, creating heavy compound nuclei. They then used strong magnetic fields in the BGS to separate the putative element 118 ions. The Berkeley lab is not currently answering questions about how the misidentification process occurred, but some media outlets have reported falsification of the results by one team member.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The original announcement came soon after the successful production of element 114 by scientists at Russia¿s Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna , in January 1999. LBL researchers believed that their newly formed element 118, dubbed "ununoctium" (meaning one-one-eight), radioactively decayed within milliseconds, to create the element 116--also never previously synthesized. Since then, the Russian scientists have used a different method to reproduce element 116, but at least for now, element 118 must remain crossed off the Periodic Table.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe