Elephants’ peculiar whiskers help them sense the world around them

Pachyderm whiskers are more flexible at the tip than at the base, allowing elephants to complete delicate tasks with their incredibly strong trunk

Zookeeper feeling an elephant's trunk while giving it some fruit

Zookeeper feeling an elephant's whiskers.

Heidelberg Zoo & Alejandro Posada, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Watching an elephant forage for roots reveals both the strength and the sensitivity of its trunk. With more than 40,000 muscles, an elephant’s trunk can upend a tree and then gently collect the fragments that fell. It takes baby elephants nearly a year to master using their trunk in this way, and it’s taken humans even longer to understand how they’re able to do it. The secret may come down to elephants’ whiskers.

Researchers who analyzed the whiskers lining these animals’ trunks have discovered a unique structural property that helps elephants sense the world around them and determine whether a task calls for strength or sensitivity. In a study published in Science, the authors show that elephants’ whiskers—unlike the whiskers of other mammals—are more flexible at the tip and stiffer closer to the skin.

This observation helps scientists better understand elephants’ “umwelt,” or their individual sensory and perceptual experience of the world. “We found elephants are like aliens,” says Andrew K. Schulz, lead study author and a mechanical engineer at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems in Germany. “They have these hornlike whiskers with a [puzzling] stiffness gradient.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Because elephants have such rough, armorlike skin, investigators knew the whiskers on their trunks were probably doing a lot of sensory work to allow the animals to interact delicately with the world around them. But to truly understand these tiny filaments, they needed a much closer look. Alongside imaging and mechanical tests, Schulz and his colleagues used a CT scanner specially built for small objects to create a digital rendering of the elephant whiskers; this let the team analyze whisker structure from the inside out.

A close up of the inside of an elephant's trunk.

Armin Kritzinger/Getty Images

The part of the whisker closer to an elephant’s skin is very strong and porous, they found, whereas the tip’s material is denser and much more flexible. Wanting to understand the mechanics of this unique form, the team members 3D-printed a supersize version of a whisker with an accurate stiffness gradient to feel for themselves.

“I was walking down the hallway and hitting things [with the whisker], and I had this true eureka moment,” says Katherine J. Kuchenbecker, senior author of the study and director of the haptic intelligence department at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems. She noticed that hitting something hard with the stiff base of the whisker felt much more solid and crisp than hitting something with the softer tip, giving her a sense of the object without her skin even touching it.

Elephants use their trunks to breathe, smell, grab things, communicate and even perceive objects outside their line of sight. And their whiskers help to shape these experiences. “Nearly every mammal—not just elephants—has whiskers whose size, shape and material properties are almost certainly adapted to the way that species uses touch in its environment,” explains Mitra Hartmann, a biomedical and mechanical engineer at Northwestern University, who was not involved in the study.

Schulz and his team incorporated their data into a tool kit for researchers in other fields to explore. They are particularly interested in seeing how materials with a similar stiffness gradient could be applied to robotics. Maintaining machines’ strength while making them soft enough to avoid damaging the materials they interact with is a major robotics challenge.

“This study is a fabulous example of interdisciplinary science,” says John Hutchinson, a biologist at the University of London’s Royal Veterinary College. “It is elegant neuroscience, anatomy and mechanics.”

K. R. Callaway is an editorial intern at Scientific American. She specializes in science, health, history and policy.

More by K. R. Callaway
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Trunk Sense” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 5 (), p. 10
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican052026-5db3oXqY4kWp6HfDjXH9fh

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe