Embattled Residents of Flooded English Village Protect Memories

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

MOORLAND, England (Reuters) - The village of Moorland in southwest England lies largely deserted, eerily silent save for the creaking of flood defenses which failed to stop the flow of muddy brown water now standing chest-high along its main street.

Its residents were among thousands across England who fell victim to the country's wettest January in nearly 250 years, with heavy rain and storms damaging homes, businesses and transport links and heaping pressure on a government criticized for being too slow to react.

In Moorland, part of the badly hit Somerset Levels region where more than 65 million cubic meters of flood water is being pumped out at a rate of 3 million cubic meters a day, water stretches out in all directions as far as the eye can see.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The air reeks of petrol leaking from cars which float abandoned along with other debris in the still-rising water. Sandbags are stacked up outside empty houses.

Phil Vize is one of a handful of residents who remain, water lapping around his legs as he makes coffee in the kitchen of the house his wife's family have lived in for generations.

He has moved what furniture would fit into the upstairs rooms of the house, but his collection of vintage cars already lies submerged outside.

"I'm trying to save everything I can but there's just too much stuff, too many memories," he said.

Most of Moorland's few remaining residents say they will try to save photos and pets if they are forced to go.

"Once the sentimentality was out of the way I wasn't bothered about my TV etc, I was only interested in my pets," said dog-owner Angela Greenway, who is co-coordinating the distribution of donated supplies from her house.

Prime Minister David Cameron has said money is no object in the relief effort, pledging 130 million pounds ($220 million) of extra funding to help tackle the floods as well as schemes to help affected households and businesses.

But Britain's two-party coalition government has faced increasing pressure over the situation, with critics saying problems have been exacerbated by years of under-investment in river dredging and flood defenses.

Several politicians who have donned rubber boots to wade through muddy waters on visits to flooded areas have received a rough ride from residents angry at the government's response.

A poll by ComRes for ITV News over the weekend found 72 percent did not think the government was in control of the flooding situation, with nearly two thirds of the 2,031 people surveyed saying it did not respond well to the crisis.

The Environment Agency has warned it may take months for the ground-water level to drop, after January saw five months' worth of rain in just 19 days. Two severe flood warnings remain in place for the southwest of England.

"I'm going to stay and hope it doesn't get much worse," said Vize. "Surely it can't get any worse?"

(Reporting by Cathal MacNaughton, Writing by Kylie MacLellan; editing by Stephen Addison)

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe