New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Embracing the Mess

Individuals often overestimate how harshly others judge a messy, chaotic life

Scientific American MIND, Jan-Feb 2022

Scientific American MIND, Jan-Feb 2022

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The pandemic has been a hard time for most people, even if not everyone is struggling in the same way. Families, for example—mothers in particular—had to shift their routines drastically to accommodate remote schooling schedules for kids, which disrupted daily life in big ways. Several of my mom friends lamented to me repeatedly that they felt shame about giving their children the iPad to occupy them or letting them watch inordinate amounts of TV so the adults could get their own tasks done (or just have a break!). Pandemic aside, parenting seems to be one area where people are worried that others must think they’re a “bad mom” or “bad dad” for not adhering to some idea of perfection. But as social psychologist Anna Bruk writes in the cover story, our so-called messy lives aren’t really noticed by outsiders. And giving yourself a high dose of self-compassion is a tried-and-true way to relax about an imperfect—and sometimes chaotic—existence (see “Other People Don’t Think You’re a Mess”).

Elsewhere in this issue, check out the surprising ways that the sound of our voice affects how we perceive ourselves (see “A Change to the Sound of the Voice Can Change Your Very Self-Identity”) and a report from senior editor Gary Stix on whether we’ll ever want to get close to people again (see “COVID Expanded the Boundaries of Personal Space—Maybe for Good”). Yes, life has been exceptionally unsettling lately, but it’s the only one we’ve got.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
SA Mind Vol 33 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Embracing the Mess” in SA Mind Vol. 33 No. 1 (), p. 2
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0122-2

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe