Emissions from Asia Put U.S. Cities over the Ozone Limit

Satellite data could warn of incoming air pollution.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Katherine Rowland of Nature magazine

As plumes of pollution rise over the booming industrial towns of Asia, satellite data could help to alert people in other regions to the approach of drifting smog.

A team of researchers from the U.S. has conducted the first high-resolution analysis of ozone--the main constituent of smog--traveling from Asia to the western United States. The group's findings, published last month in the Journal of Geophysical Research, indicate that the contribution of Asian emissions to intercontinental pollution is higher than was previously believed.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Scientists have been documenting the phenomenon of pollution crossing the Pacific Ocean since the 1990s. Most research so far has focused on how imported emissions affect average pollution levels, but the latest analysis goes further, says Meiyun Lin, an atmospheric chemist at Princeton University in New Jersey, who is the lead author of the study. "We show that Asian emissions directly contribute to ground-level pollution in the United States."

Using chemical modeling, Lin and her colleagues distinguished between locally generated pollution and that arriving from thousands of miles away. They analzsed air-quality data from satellites and ground measurements to track the passage of ozone from Asia's churning factories to the western United States over the course of a few days in mid-2010.

They found that the majority of US ground pollution came from local sources, but as much as 20 percent was attributable to Asian emissions.

Kathy Law, a chemist at the LATMOS-CNRS atmospheric-science and astrophysics research institute in Paris, says the results show that controlling long-range pollution is an international issue.

Imported smog

Under the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Ambient Air Quality Standards, ozone should not exceed 75 parts per billion of the atmosphere. Lin and her colleagues found that on days when ozone levels in US cities were higher than the maximum, Asian emissions pushed them over the top more than half the time.

Terry Keating, an air-quality scientist at the EPA Office of Air and Radiation in Washington, D.C., says that although the study contributes to efforts to understand how global emissions affect regional pollution, further investigation is needed to quantify the impact. He adds, however, that satellite data could be useful for forecasting spikes in pollution.

The findings carry significant implications not only for regulating local emissions, but also for negotiating international standards.

Although ozone emissions have been falling in the United States and Europe, they have been on the rise in Asia, and especially in China.

Alongside the Asia's rapid economic growth, expanding indutry contributes to a measurbale increase in ozone pollution in the US at a rate of 0.8-1 percent each year, says Daniel Jaffe, a chemist at the University of Washington Bothell. "That's not a trivial amount."

Although the U.S. government is working with China to help to improve air quality, negotiating international emissions standards is a challenging and often volatile issue.

However, Jaffe suggests that it is in this context--rife with political tension--that forecasting might prove most useful. Even if governments don't act immediately to lower ozone standards, an early-warning system could still protect the people who are most susceptible to health risks related to air quality.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on March 5, 2012

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe